Parse Arm EABI section to detect hard-/softfloat usage #961
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is an update to PR 863: Old toolchains produce binaries without hard-/softfloat markers. Rasbian is missinng the markers and the oracle JDK is also affected. For hardfloat detection now also the Arm EABI section is also considered. If either the elf hardfloat flag is set or the Arm EABI section indicates hardfloat the binary is reported as hardfloat.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an update to PR 863: Old toolchains produce binaries without
hard-/softfloat markers. Rasbian is missinng the markers and the oracle
JDK is also affected.
For hardfloat detection now also the Arm EABI section is also considered.
If either the elf hardfloat flag is set or the Arm EABI section indicates
hardfloat the binary is reported as hardfloat.